Efficacy of distance training program for cardiopulmonary resuscitation utilizing smartphone application and home delivery system.

AIM OF THE STUDY: Community cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) education is important for laypersons. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, with social distancing, conventional face-to-face CPR training was unavailable. We developed a distance learning CPR training course (HEROS-Remote) using a smartphone application that monitors real-time chest compression quality and a home delivery collection system for mannikins. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the HEROS-Remote course by comparing chest compression quality with that of conventional CPR training. METHODS: We applied layperson CPR education with HEROS-Remote and conventional education in Seoul during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both groups underwent a 2-min post-training chest compression test, and we tested non-inferiority. Chest compression depth, rate, complete recoil, and composite chest compression score was measured. Trainees completed a satisfaction survey on CPR education and delivery. The primary outcome was the mean chest compression depth. RESULTS: A total of 180 trainees were enrolled, with 90 assigned to each training group. Chest compression depth of HEROS-Remote training showed non-inferiority to that of conventional training (67.4 vs. 67.8, p = 0.78), as well as composite chest compression score (92.7 vs. 95.5, p = 0.16). The proportions of adequate chest compression depth, chest compression rate, and chest compressions with complete chest recoil were similar in both training sessions. In the HEROS-Remote training, 90% of the trainees were satisfied with CPR training, and 96% were satisfied with the delivery and found it convenient. CONCLUSION: HEROS-Remote training was non-inferior to conventional CPR training in terms of chest compression quality. Distance learning CPR training using a smartphone application and mannikin delivery had high user satisfaction and was logistically feasible.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest system-of-care: Which survival chain factor contributed the most?

OBJECTIVES: In many communities, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival outcomes decreased after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to identify and compare the impacts of each survival chain factor on the change of survival outcomes after COVID-19. METHODS: Using a Korean out-of-hospital cardiac arrest registry, we analyzed OHCA patients whose arrest was not witnessed by emergency medical service (EMS) providers between 2017 and 2021. Because lack of hospital and survival information in 2021, the 2021 data were used only to identify the expected trend. We developed a prediction model for survival to discharge using patients from 2017 to 2019 (Pre-COVID-19 set) and validated it using patients from 2020 (post-COVID-19 set). Using Utstein elements, a stepwise logistic regression model was constructed, and discrimination and calibration were evaluated by c-statistics and scaled Brier score. Using the distribution change of predictors from one year before the pandemic (2019) to post-COVDI-19, we calculated the magnitude of survival difference according to each predictor's distribution change using the marginal standardization method. RESULTS: Among 83,273 patients (mean age 67.2 years and 64.3% males), 61,180 and 22,092 patients belonged to pre-COVOD-19 and post-COVID-19 sets. Survival to discharge was 5019 (8.2%) in pre-COVID-19 set and 1457 (6.6%) in post-COVID-19 set. The proportion of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 59.0% in the pre-COVID-19 set and 61.0% in the post-COVID-19 set. The median (interquartile range) response time was 7 (5-9) minutes in the pre-COVID-19 set and 8 (6-10) minutes in the post-COVID-19 set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve (95% confidence interval) was 0.907 (0.902-0.912) in the pre-COVID-19 set, and 0.924 (0.916-0.931) in the post-COVID-19 set, and scaled Brier score were 0.39 in pre-COVID-19 sets, and 0.40 in the post-COVID-19 set. Among various predictors, EMS factors showed the highest impact. Response time and on-scene management of EMS showed the highest impact on decreased survival. A similar trend was also expected in the 2021. CONCLUSION: The effort to create a rapid response system for OHCA patients could have priority for the recovery of survival outcomes in OHCA patients in the post-COVID-19 period. Further studies to recover survival outcomes of OHCA are warranted.

Expert Consensus on Measures to Promote Physical and Psychological Health among COVID-19-Related Healthcare Workers in Korea using Delphi Technique.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused health problems and distress among healthcare workers (HCWs), so supportive measures to promote their health and relieve distress are needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted two rounds of Delphi surveys with 20 COVID-19-related frontline healthcare professionals and public officials. The surveys evaluated means of supporting HCWs' health by improving health care systems and working environments in terms of effectiveness and urgency. The validity of the measures was assessed by calculating the content validity ratio. RESULTS: The top-priority measures to support HCWs were "secure isolation units capable of treating severe cases" in the facility infrastructure category, "secure nursing staff dedicated for patients in the intensive care units" in the personnel infrastructure category, "improve communication between central office and frontline field" in the cooperation system category, "support personal protective equipment and infection control supplies" in the aid supplies category, and "realization of hazard pay" in the physical/mental health and compensation category. CONCLUSION: There was consensus among the experts on the validity and priorities of policies in the facility, personnel, cooperation, supplies, and compensation categories regarding measures to promote COVID-19 related HCWs' health.

The general public's perspectives on telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea: analysis of a nationwide survey.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the awareness, experience, approval, intention to use, and the desired type of telemedicine among Korean general public. METHODS: From November to December 2020, we conducted an online self-reported survey on awareness, experience, approval, and intent to use telemedicine services among Korean residents aged 20 years or older. A total of 2,097 participants completed the survey. RESULTS: Of the 2,097 participants, 1,558 (74.3%) were aware of, 1,198 (57.1%) approved of, and 1,474 (70.3%) had the intention to use telemedicine. Participants from regions other than the Seoul metropolitan area and Daegu-Gyeongbuk Province (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.63), households with a monthly household income of US$6,000 or more (aOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.08), participants who had a college/university or associate's degree (aOR, 1.35. 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.75) or a master's degree or above (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.20 to 2.50), and housewives (aOR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.64) had higher odds of approval. Elderly participants, those with a chronic disease (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.54), those who had experienced delays of healthcare services (aOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.27 to 2.96), and those who had experience with telemedicine (aOR, 4.28; 95% CI, 1.69 to 10.82) were more likely to intend to use telemedicine services. Regarding types of telemedicine, teleconsultation between doctors showed the highest approval rate (73.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, more than 70% of participants had already used or intended to use telemedicine at some point. Groups with a substantial need for telemedicine were more in favor of telemedicine.